Dude what are you smoking, I want some. Let me preface this by saying that I'm 100% in agreement that they reduced the required exp to level by 25%, and I commented on Duo's video saying as much (because he made the mistake of thinking that 33% faster leveling meant 33% reduced exp required, which it doesn't) and he agreed with me as well. But Duo was replying to you in the comment you posted a pic of, not me. He was explaining the way it works to you because you seem very confused, and honestly the fact that you saw it as confirmation of your strange notions is troubling. If the required exp is reduced, then the percentage gained from receiving the same flat exp would increase. What they did with this patch is reduce required exp by 25%. Say that a mob gave 100 exp before that change, and that 100 exp was 10% of a given level. Now, after the change, the mob still gives 100 exp, but since you only need 750 instead of 1,000, you'll be getting 13.33% from that mob instead of 10%. Because, you know, 100 is 13.33% of 750. As I said in my reply to you on that video, percentages are all we see when we gain exp so what you're suggesting makes no sense. If you still think it does, then please explain to me how 100 exp would still be 10% of 750 and how gaining the same percentage per hour as before would somehow lead to faster leveling. I mean, if you still get 10% of a level in one hour, how does that now magically equal less than 10 hours to level? You seem to be confused. The person you're quoting said: "We only see %, so if the xp needed is lower, the % per mob or per hour gained would increase for everyone." Like they said, we only see percentages; we have no idea what the actual exp number is that mobs give. So it's completely nonsensical to say that people might not notice because exp required to level was decreased rather than exp from mobs being increased. Whether they reduced required exp by 25% or raised exp from mobs by 33%, the result that people would see is the same: what would previously have given 10% exp would now give 13.33%. That's all @RengerEl was saying, so your condescending post explaining basic maths as if their claim was ridiculous is only indicative of your own misunderstandings.