Take a gun, run into a bank, and demand 5 bucks. Then tell them "5 bucks from that ?, thats nothing" and they'll rightfully laugh at you. People just want to see a zero tolerance policy (as outlined in the ToS) to be applied here, because where do you draw the line? 200k silver a month? 200k silver a week? 200k silver a day? Take of your pink glasses and consider the whole fallout of such a stupid decision clearly showing favoritism. Actually, I've been in a similar situation before, although it wasn't exploit related. Someone posted NDA'ed information on a forum. I only quoted a single line completely out of context – so nobody would have been able to do anything with that – as a reply, basically saying "uh, you can't post that, but then again it says nothing about the NDA'ed content, because it could be anything". I still got a temporary ban. It literally was nothing, yet I didn't try to fight it or anything, because in the end it mattered and could have sent a precedence. When is a NDA broken? Only if you post more than a sentence or line? Same here: There should never be any comparison regarding "how much did they exploit?" The question is whether someone exploited, not how much.